Peer review is a particular terminology, which each and every researcher, who wants to publish their research works in a good quality journal, has to encounter with. This is a very well known and preferred procedure followed in almost all of the reputed journals across the world, and across every academic domain. Various features of the submitted research work for possible publication in any particular journal is reviewed and scrutinized by means of this process, and at the end of this process the reviewers can come with three kinds of decisions, namely accept the work for publication, provide review comments and resubmit the paper by incorporating those review comments, and reject the work. This process is very meticulous and takes a long period of time. However, to ensure the quality of the work to be published, this is an inevitable and extremely imperative process. Every time, it is not always possible on the part of the researcher or the supervisor, under whom the work has been carried out, to find out all the shortcomings in the work, as the work is their own brainchild. Involving a third party, who has a totally neutral viewpoint or who can work as a devil’s advocate, can provide them with more superior suggestions regarding improvement of the work. For reviewing the work, it is always suggested to send the paper to that kind of third parties, who can bring forth more insights, which the researcher has never thought of, and in this way the quality of the work is improved. Peers of a researcher are nearly their competitors in the academic domain, and therefore the insights provided by them are mostly turn out to be significant enough to be incorporated or to be looked into. For more information about various aspects of peer review of any research based journal paper, kindly browse through the pages of www.dissertationtutors.co.uk.